The Woman in the Black Shell Jacket Takes the F Train at 6:47
The woman in the black shell jacket takes the F train at 6:47. Acronym. Four seasons ago. Well before all the chrome pointy studs. Friction wearing down the Schoeller fabric where the Bagjack messenger bag has been swiveling from front to back thousands of times.
This is not a love story. In another timeline, maybe. But it’s not.
This is a story about value extraction, and how we learned to call it self-care.
Every Thursday evening, LES to Chelsea, the same jacket, the same door, the same practiced unconsciousness of being observed. We have never spoken. We never will. This is what we call “boundaries” now. When she isn’t there the absence registers like a skipped frame in a film nobody else is watching.
These are the last organic systems of recognition in American cities. Watch how they’re being monetized. Notice when we gave up, how we gave up, and what we agreed to call the transaction: wellness.
Call them glimmers: those recurring half-recognitions between strangers who share a schedule but never a conversation, who orbit the same spaces without ever colliding, who matter without mattering.
Call them glimmers: those recurring half-recognitions between strangers who share a schedule but never a conversation, who orbit the same spaces without ever colliding, who matter without mattering.
*
Here is what glimmers are worth: Hinge, $500 million annually. The coffee shop where actual bodies occupy actual space, where the barista knows your Tuesday mood is different from your Thursday mood: .05% of that. The bartender who could map the entire neighborhood’s emotional weather, who knows who drinks alone on Wednesdays and why: $18 an hour plus tips. The K-pop level 3D-rendered perfection of the Supermoon cookie slingers that authentically dazzle locals and tourists alike: 80 cents gratuity @ 10% of 8 dollar sweet treats.
The algorithm that sorts loneliness into purchasable tiers: $300,000 plus equity.
The human who notices when you stop showing up: minimum wage.
*
The algorithm that sorts loneliness into purchasable tiers: $300,000 plus equity.
The human who notices when you stop showing up: minimum wage.
Certain things were understood, once. That cities generated their own systems of recognition. That frequency created intimacy. That third places were infrastructure. That the person who made your coffee every morning was performing a kind of municipal service. That the gym regular whose schedule matched yours was a form of social punctuation. That these things had value but not price.
We understand different things now. We understand that not talking to strangers is “honoring our boundaries.” We understand that paying for connection apps is “investing in ourselves.” We understand that living in parallel isolation is “doing the work.”
*
Consider the platforms. They treat loneliness as a solvable problem, which is to say, a renewable resource. Every micro-connection that might have bloomed, a nod, a pattern, the particular way someone takes up space, has been harvested, processed, resold. What the city once produced spontaneously now costs $39 per month. The free version includes ads.
This is not a metaphor. This is a business model. This is also what we’re calling mental health.
*
Last night I dreamt I was building what I called a glimmer platform. Not for connection, but for acknowledgment. “To the person who helped me save my milk tea from falling on the ground at Eldridge and Broome on Tuesday.” “To the person I made eye contact with during the freak rainstorm at the Chinatown soccer pitch.” Three dollars to post. Free to read. Posts expire after thirty days.
This is neither Craigslist Missed Connections (which became predatory) nor dating apps (which require outcomes). This is something else: the treatment of momentary stranger-recognition as complete unto itself. A public record of urban intimacy that demands nothing, promises nothing, leads nowhere.
I was printing quarterly zines by neighborhood. Twenty-five dollars for the best glimmers of Bed-Stuy, of the Lower East Side, of Sunset Park. The city’s ephemeral moments, fossilized just long enough to acknowledge they happened, then allowed to disappear.
This is still monetization. But it’s monetization that preserves the thing itself rather than processing it into something else. The glimmer remains a glimmer. The almost remains almost. You pay three dollars to say “that mattered” to someone who will never read it, or maybe will, but either way nothing more is expected.
Even in my dreams, I’m selling connection back to ourselves.
*
The bodega cat does not scale. The bodega cat cannot be optimized. The bodega cat is what happens when a system has enough slack to accommodate the unnecessary. But here’s what else the bodega cat does: it transforms customers into neighbors. You talk about the cat. You worry when it’s not there. You bring it treats. The cat creates a network of concern that has nothing to do with commerce and everything to do with care.
We don’t have bodega cats in the apps. We have engagement metrics.
*
The woman in the black shell jacket represents nothing. She is not a symbol. She is a person taking a train, and I am a person taking the same train, and in another version of this city that might have meant something, might have become something, might have accumulated into the kind of recognition that makes strangers into neighbors into the people you call when the water stops working.
Or maybe someone will post about her. “To the woman in the black shell jacket, F train, 6:47.” Not to find her. Not to date her. Just to mark it: this pattern in the chaos, this recurring presence, this almost that will never be more than almost. Three dollars to acknowledge what the city gives us for free, what we’re slowly forgetting how to see.
*
What they’re selling: connection, community, belonging.
What they need us to have: isolation, atomization, sustainable loneliness.
The platforms require our disconnection the way cigarette companies require addiction. This is not solving the problem. This is managing the problem. This is making the problem profitable.
*
There was a moment, maybe 2019, maybe earlier, when we stopped fighting it. When stranger-danger became standard operating procedure for adults. When we decided that knowing someone meant following them, that presence meant being tagged, that community meant Discord servers full of people who would recognize your username but not your face.
We didn’t lose. We negotiated terms. We called the terms wellness.
*
This is what actually dies when glimmers die: the possibility of a city that surprises you into connection. The chance that today, on this train, in this coffee shop, at this gym, something might begin. Not something you paid for. Not something you optimized. Something that happened because two people happened to be in the same place at the same time, over and over, until the almost became something else.
Without glimmers, every relationship becomes intentional, which means every relationship becomes work. We lose the gift economy of recognition, where knowing someone’s pattern is a form of care that costs nothing and creates everything. We lose the sidewalk ballet that Jane Jacobs wrote about, where safety came not from cameras but from eyes, from the accumulated concern of people who knew you without knowing your name.
What becomes impossible: the unplanned friendship. The romance that begins with repetition, not algorithm. The network of loose ties that catches you when you fall. The city that knows when you’re missing.
What becomes impossible: the unplanned friendship. The romance that begins with repetition, not algorithm. The network of loose ties that catches you when you fall. The city that knows when you’re missing.
We’re not just losing connection. We’re losing the possibility of connection without transaction. We’re losing the civic muscle that transforms strangers into citizens through nothing more than shared time and space. We’re losing the kind of social fabric that can only be woven through repetition, through the slow accumulation of almosts that might, given time, become something more.
*
The infrastructure for glimmers still exists, fossilized in our muscle memory. We know to look up at 6:47. We know the phantom schedule of strangers. We navigate by the emotional GPS of almost-familiar faces.
We’re letting it atrophy while building elaborate systems to solve the problems its absence creates.
*
The woman in the black shell jacket was back on Thursday. Different car, same time. We didn’t acknowledge each other. That’s not how this works anymore. That’s not how anything works anymore.
This is what we’ve built: the managed loneliness of parallel lives, the premium subscription to what was once just called living in a city.
The glimmers aren’t extinct yet. You can still feel them, like phantom limbs, like the names of people you almost knew. Soon they’ll exist only in archives, in quarterly zines, in three-dollar posts that expire after thirty days. “To the woman who used to take the F train at 6:47.” “To the city that used to notice.”
The woman takes the F train at 6:47.
This is not a love story.
This is barely a story at all.
This is just what happened, which is what we let happen. Which is what’s happening now, in the space between two people who share a schedule, a train, a city, a moment. Who could speak but won’t. Who could know each other but don’t. Who represent nothing except the possibility we’re all watching disappear, one glimmer at a time, while we call it something else entirely.


